Starwood Set to Accept Offer From Chinese Firm
Please note that I receive compensation for many links on this blog. American Express and other banks are advertising partners of this site. Read my Advertiser Disclosure policy to learn more.
In the continuing saga of Starwood’s need to find a buyer that “Explores Strategic and Financial Alternatives to Increase Shareholder Value”, there’s been a new development today. Last week we found out that Starwood had received an unsolicited bid from a Chinese firm, and all eyes were on Starwood to see what they would do.
The shareholders were set to vote on the Marriott/Starwood merger at the end of this month on March 28, 2016 but then the surprising bid from the consortium including Anbang Insurance Group Ltd came in for $12.8 billion, surpassing the $12.2 billion that Marriott had offered.
Today, Starwood issued a press release that the Starwood Board of Directors has determined that the new offer “constitutes a superior proposal” to the one that Marriott initially offered. This is even with taking into consideration that Starwood would need to pay Marriott the $400 million breakup fee owed if Starwood terminated their agreement with Marriott.
So now the clock starts ticking. Marriott has until 11:50pm ET on March 28, 2016 to effectively revise their bid and come in with a higher or more attractive offer.
Because the timeline has been pushed back, the stockholder meeting is being postponed until a later date.
Stay tuned for the next chapter…
Editorial Note: The opinions expressed here are mine and not provided, reviewed or endorsed by any bank, card issuer, or other company including (but not limited to) American Express unless otherwise stated. Comments made in response to posts are not provided or commissioned, and they have not been reviewed or endorsed by any bank. It is not the responsibility of any advertiser to make sure that questions are answered.
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of the material on this site without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited.